There is no lower limit.
Suppose the length is x cm, then perimeter = 12 cm implies that the breadth is 6 - x cm
So the area is x*(6-x) sq cm = 6x - x2 sq cm.
This is a continuous function of x which decreases to zero as x increases towards 6. Although x cannot be 6 since then the rectangle would have no length and therefore would not be a rectangle, it can go infinitesimally close to 6. Then the area is infinitesimally close to 0.
no some rectangles cannot be similar. a rectangle is a shape with 2 = sides and then 2 more different = sides. it is impossible because if 2 rectangles were similar than that would not be a rectangle. similar means having corresponding sides no it is not possible
You would call the group of shapes which has at least one line of symmetry symmetrical shapes. Stars, circles, and rectangles are considered symmetrical shapes.
No. All rectangles are not squares. Think of rectangles and squares as boxes. Would you be able to fit a rectangle into the square box? Nope. But you would be able to fit the square into the rectangle box. <---- Hope that helped. :)
no, if it did then that would be a square
No
There would be an infinite number of rectangles possible
no some rectangles cannot be similar. a rectangle is a shape with 2 = sides and then 2 more different = sides. it is impossible because if 2 rectangles were similar than that would not be a rectangle. similar means having corresponding sides no it is not possible
dont know dont care
You would call the group of shapes which has at least one line of symmetry symmetrical shapes. Stars, circles, and rectangles are considered symmetrical shapes.
No. All rectangles are not squares. Think of rectangles and squares as boxes. Would you be able to fit a rectangle into the square box? Nope. But you would be able to fit the square into the rectangle box. <---- Hope that helped. :)
no rectangles dont have 4 congruent side, otherwise it would be a square or a rhombus.
There are 36 rectangles of various sizes formed by a 9-rectangle grid. The most obvious are the smallest (9) and the largest (1), but any 2, 3, 4, or 6 adjacent rectangles can form other rectangles.
no, if it did then that would be a square
No
Do 4 sides times 4 rectangles. So it would be 4x4=16 sides
Squares are actually also rectangles so you could make 8 rectangles without touching any of the squares. However, if you could cut the squares, that would be a different problem....