That will happen if you have 5 integers.
Smaller numbers always go to the left of larger number on the number line.
To find the greatest integer plotted on a number line, you would look for the rightmost point marked on the line, as integers increase in value from left to right. If the number line is finite and has specific integers plotted, the greatest one will be the largest value among those points. If the number line extends infinitely, there is no greatest integer, as integers continue indefinitely.
For integers to the nearest ten thousand, 25000 to 34999
Probably because that's more or less the definition of "rational number": a number that can be expressed as a ratio of integers.
Yes. Rational numbers are always the quotient of two integers. Integers are always real, and you cannot divide a real number by another real number and get an imaginary number. So, true.
Smaller numbers always go to the left of larger number on the number line.
This will work as long as "five" is an acceptable substitute for "several".
Yes, the difference between two integers is always a whole number.
The sum of two consecutive integers will always be an odd number.
the greatest number that is an integer and rational number but is not a natural or whole number is -1
The greatest common multiple of any set of integers is infinite.
For integers to the nearest ten thousand, 25000 to 34999
Yes, integers are always rational.
The greatest factor of any integer is the number itself. The GCF of 8 and 28 is 4.
A rational number is a number than can be written p/q with p and q integers Any integers can be written this was with q=1
Probably because that's more or less the definition of "rational number": a number that can be expressed as a ratio of integers.
Ted used five integers. EXAMPLE: 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1