This number is important because it seperates the negatives and positives
Chat with our AI personalities
Zero Half of 0 is still 0
The Romans had no numeral for the value zero, so '0' could not be represented by a numeral. However in the middle ages monks, who still used Roman numerals and wrote in Latin, introduced the numeral N (from the Latin Nulae, meaning nothing) to represent zero.
there is no roman numeral for itAnother answer: The Romans had no numeral to represent zero because there was no need for a zero in their system. We have 9 numbers plus the zero symbol. We add a zero on to the end of a number to convert it to tens and two zeros to convert it to hundreds and so on. The Romans simply had different symbols for tens and hundreds. For example we would write 1, 10, 20, 40, 50, 100 and 200 but the same numbers as Roman numerals would be I, X, XX, XL, L, C and CC, done quite simply with no need for a zero. In the middle ages monks, who still used Roman numerals and wrote in Latin, began to used the symbol N to represent zero (from the Latin Nullae meaning nothing).
8 = VIII (there is no Roman numeral for zero).
Zero(0) means NOTHING!!!! So how can you multiply nothing !!!!