The smallest positive integer is 1 (a positive integer is a whole number: 1, 2, 3, and so on). But zero may also be considered - depending on circumstances: 0, 1, 2, 3, and so on). Though 1 is my answer.
1 is the smallest positive integer. But if you include negative integers, there is no smallest.
The positive integers are {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ...}. The smallest one is 1.
An integer is a whole number. So zero could be the smallest integer.
It is 1296.
The number zero is not the smallest positive integer. The number one is the smallest positive integer.
The smallest positive integer is 1 (a positive integer is a whole number: 1, 2, 3, and so on). But zero may also be considered - depending on circumstances: 0, 1, 2, 3, and so on). Though 1 is my answer.
1 is the smallest positive integer. But if you include negative integers, there is no smallest.
The positive integers are {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ...}. The smallest one is 1.
The smallest positive integer is 1. The largest negative integer is -1. 1 > -1
No. Integers are positive and negative whole numbers (…, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, …). As there are an infinite number of negative integers as they approach negative infinity (the greatest negative integer being -1), there can be no smallest (negative) integer.
The smallest positive integer is 1. 1 is the multiplicative identity; ie anything times 1 is itself. The greatest negative integer is the most positive negative integer which is -1. Therefore the product of the greatest negative integer and the smallest positive integer is the greatest negative integer which is -1.
An integer is a whole number. So zero could be the smallest integer.
It is 192.
It is: 4
1
2520