Required volume = 3*36 = 108 Cube options: 43 = 64 < 108 < 125 = 53 So a perfect cube box, with sides of length 5 units would be the smallest suitable box.
no it is not 4 is a perfect cube
No, 148 is not a perfect cube.
No, 2 is neither a perfect square nor a perfect cube.
Because they are square/cube of an integer.
For a number to be a perfect square and a perfect cube, it must be a perfect sixth power. Now 36 = 729 is too small and 56 = 15625 is too large, leaving 46 = 4096 as the answer.
36
Required volume = 3*36 = 108 Cube options: 43 = 64 < 108 < 125 = 53 So a perfect cube box, with sides of length 5 units would be the smallest suitable box.
46656 is the square of 216 and the cube of 36 2^6 x 3^6 is the square of a cube and the cube of a square.
no it is not 4 is a perfect cube
If by cube you mean perfect cube (a cube of an integer), then no, and the nearest perfect cube is 81.
No, 148 is not a perfect cube.
No, 2 is neither a perfect square nor a perfect cube.
Because they are square/cube of an integer.
It is both because 1,000,000 is a perfect cube and a perfect square number
A cube root of a perfect cube has only one dimension. A perfect cube is a number that can be obtained by multiplying an integer by itself three times. Taking the cube root of a perfect cube will give you the original integer value, effectively reducing the dimensionality back to one.
Not a perfect cube.