1/100 times 4 = 0.04 but 100 times 4 = 400
4, 16, 64, 144, 256, 400, 576, 784, 1024, 1296, 1600, etc.
For example: 20*20 = 400 and there are many more
Any multiple of 100, like 200, 300, 400, 500, 9700, etc.
100 = 400 / 4 4 x 100 = 400
1/100 times 4 = 0.04 but 100 times 4 = 400
Yes; since 2012 is a multiple of 4 and not a multiple of 100 that is NOT also a multiple of 400 (leap years get complicated if you do them right).
No, 1900 is not a multiple of 400. The multiples of 400 are 400, 800, 1200, 1600, 2000, 2400, ...
400 would have been a leap year. The method for calculating leap years is a little complicated due to all the exceptions. Years that are a multiple of 4 are a leap year, UNLESS the year is a multiple of 100 (then it is not a leap year), UNLESS the year is also a multiple of 400 (then it is a leap year). Some examples 1800 - not a leap year because it is a multiple of 100 1900 - not a leap year because it is a multiple of 100 2000 - leap year because while it is a multiple of 100, it is also a multiple of 400 2100 - not a leap year because it is a multiple of 100 400 - leap year because while it is a multiple of 100, it is also a multiple of 400
The answer is 400 minutes, 4 hours is only equivalent to 240 minutes. Thus making 400 minutes greater than 4 hours.
400 is one such multiple.
The Least Common Multiple (LCM) for 250 400 is 2,000.
No. 8 is a factor of 400. 400 is a multiple of 8.
Sure, if I knew what A and C were. If A = 4 and C = 6 A x 100 = 400 C x 100 = 600 400 + 600 = 1000
No, there will not be a February 29th in the year 2100. In the Gregorian calendar, February 29th only occurs in years that are divisible by 4, unless the year is also divisible by 100 but not by 400. Since 2100 is not divisible by 400, it will not have a leap day.
no, 9 does not go into 400 evenly
No.