7 over 4 does not equate to a whole number.
4
7/4 is not a whole number, and thus cannot be written as such. It can, however, be written as a mixed number. In this case, it would be written as 4 3/4.
4/7 (four over seven) cannot be reduced to a whole number. It divides to approximately 0.571.
1/7 is a fraction and not a whole number. So it cannot be expressed as a whole number.
7 over 4 does not equate to a whole number.
4
7/4 is not a whole number, and thus cannot be written as such. It can, however, be written as a mixed number. In this case, it would be written as 4 3/4.
33 over 7 does not equate to a whole number.
4/7 (four over seven) cannot be reduced to a whole number. It divides to approximately 0.571.
1/7 is a fraction and not a whole number. So it cannot be expressed as a whole number.
The answer is 43 and the reason why the tens digit changes is because 7 + anything over 2 will change the digit. If just added 7 + 6 it would be 13 then add 30. 1 + any whole number over 8 will change the tens digit 2 + any whole number over 7 will change the tens digit 3 + any whole number over 6 will change the tens digit 4 + any whole number over 5 will change the tens digit 5 + any whole number over 4 will change the tens digit 6 + any whole number over 3 will change the tens digit 7 + any whole number over 2 will change the tens digit 8 + any whole number over 1 will change the tens digit 9+ any whole number over 0 will change the tens digit ect
It is: 7/2 = 3.5 and rounded to a whole number it is 4
Since 52 is not divisible by 7, 52 over 7 is a mixed fraction. It cannot be written as a whole number for the simple reason that it is not a whole number.
If that's the mixed number 7 and 1/3, the whole number is 7.
3 over 7 is a fraction and is not equivalent to a whole number.
yes It depends upon the context. If "3 over 7" is intended to be a fraction, then it is not a whole number.