No. each number has more factors than just 1 and 64 or 1 and 80
45 and 64 are not prime numbers because they both have more than two factors
64/80 = 8/10 = 80/100 = 80% 64 is 80% of 80.
No, they are not relatively prime.
It can be. 26 is relatively prime to 27. 26 is not relatively prime to 34.
25 is relatively prime with 36. 25 is not relatively prime with 35.
22 is not relatively prime
No, they are not relatively prime.
Yes, 45 and 64 are relatively prime because they do not share any prime factors.
80 and 189 are relatively prime as they have no common factors other than 1.
No, 64 and 144 are not relatively prime. To be relatively prime, the only common factor they could have would be 1. They have other common factors such as 2, 4, 8 and 16.
Both are not prime numbers, but they are relatively prime.
No two even numbers are relatively prime. The GCF is 2.
Their GCF is 1.
45 and 64 are not prime numbers because they both have more than two factors
Their GCF is 1.
Just 2.
2 is the greatest common factor and it is prime