The only prime factor of 64 is 2.
64 has only one prime factor and it is 2
That's a false statement. Both 16 and 64 have one prime factor. 16 can't be the LCM of two prime numbers and 64 can't be the product. If you leave out the word prime, you can use 16 and 4.
Six twos.
The only prime factor these numbers share is 2. It is the only prime factor of 64, which is 2 to the 6th power. The hcf is 16, but that is not a prime.
No two even numbers are relatively prime. The GCF is 2.
22 is not relatively prime
45 and 64 are not prime numbers because they both have more than two factors
2 is the greatest common factor and it is prime
Yes, 45 and 64 are relatively prime because they do not share any prime factors.
Numbers are either prime or they aren't. In this case, 45 is divisible by 3 and 15; sixty-four goes into 2, 4, 8 and 32. The term "relatively prime" compares two numbers and their common factors. If the GCF of the two numbers is 1, then they are "relatively prime."
The LCM is 5184. The numbers 81 and 64 have no common factors. When you have two relatively prime numbers, you find their LCM by multiplying them. So 5184 is 81x64.
They are both even numbers that means both have 2 as a common factor. So the answer is NO!
No, 64 and 144 are not relatively prime. To be relatively prime, the only common factor they could have would be 1. They have other common factors such as 2, 4, 8 and 16.
Can't be, they're both even numbers so must have a common factor of 2...
They both are not prime numbers
The only prime factor of 64 is 2.