No, it is only divisible by 10, but not 9.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 10, 15, 29, 30, 58, 87, 145, 174, 290, 435, 870.
NO. 1110 is not divisible by 9. A number is divisible by 9 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 9. 1110 = 1 + 1 + 1 + 0 = 3 (3 is not divisible by 9, thus, 1110 is not divisible by 9.)
All numbers divisible by 3 are NOT divisible by 9. As an example, 6, which is divisible by 3, is not divisible by 9. However, all numbers divisible by 9 are also divisible by 3 because 9 is divisible by 3.
No it is not divisible by 9 .
No, it is only divisible by 10, but not 9.
2 is not divisible by 870. 870 is divisible by 2.
All multiples of 870 are divisible by 870.
4 is not divisible by 870.
No.
870 can be divisible by 2, 3, 5, 6, and 10
870 is divisible by 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 10, 15, 29, 30, 58, 87, 145, 174, 290, 435 and 870. 870, 1740, 2610 and so on are divisible by 870.
870 ÷ 6 = 145
No. But 870 is divisible by 3 (because 8+7+0 = 15 -> 1 + 5 = 6 and 6 is divisible by 3). 870/3 = 290.
No. However, if you ment to say "is 870 divisible by 10," then yes. You would get 87
No
No.