0
Is a line having a width of 1.5467 nm more evident than a line having a line width of 0.0083 nm?
The certainty of a firm answer to this question is no match for the uncertainty of
"evident" as the deciding qualification.
Personally, I should think that in general, if two things are compared side-by-side,
then the one that's 186 times as thick as the other is probably the more evident,
but that's just an opinion with little analytical rigor.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Rafa
Vivi
TaigaAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is a solid's shape and volume?
A solid is a 3 dimensional object having length, width and height. Its volume measured in cubic units is length*width*height
A rectangular field is 20m long and 14m wide there is a path of equal width all around it having an area of 111 Sq m find the width of the path?
The width of the path having an area of 111 square meters is 28.5 meters.
If Length of rectangle is 5 cm the width is?
If you have the area then you can find the width by dividing the area by the length...having the length by itself is broad
A shape having the same dimension of length height width?
cube
What is the length of the rectangle if 36cm2 is the width?
First: 36 cm2 cannot be a width. Width is a linear measure - a measure of distance - which would be measured in cm and not cm2. In any case, having just the width is not sufficient information for answering the question.
