Yes, the set of happy people is not well defined.
Yes, Because they all have the same emotions no one is sad and everyone is happy. -N.C.A
Big people is a subjective term. This term may mean one thing to someone and another thing to other person. So this set is not well defined.
If there exists even one single item for which you cannot say whether it is in the set or not, the set is not well defined.
A well defined set is one that you know exactly what is meant when you read it. For example, the set of all people 6' 1" tall is well defined. Whenever you meet someone, if they're 6'1" tall, they're in the set. Otherwise, they're not. You know exactly what I mean. So that set is well defined. The set of all cute shoes is not well defined. Jane just adores buckles, so any shoe with a buckle is cute to her. But Martha likes plain shoes. Buckles are big, ugly things that detract from the shoe. So a shoe with a buckle is not cute to Martha. So the set of all cute shoes is not well defined, because you can't just look at it and determine if it belongs in the set. So the set of all buckled shoes would be well defined, but the set of all cute shoes is not.
Yes, the set of happy people is not well defined.
A set of happy people is not well-defined because happiness is subjective and can vary greatly from person to person. What makes one person happy may not necessarily make another person happy. Therefore, it is difficult to objectively define a set of happy people.
Yes, Because they all have the same emotions no one is sad and everyone is happy. -N.C.A
its not well defined because not all the students/people like the teachers,so it is not well defined
Elements that have to be defined by personal judgement. Such as the set ofgreat songs is not well-defined. But the set of the English alphabet is well-defined.
Elements that have to be defined by personal judgement. Such as the set ofgreat songs is not well-defined. But the set of the English alphabet is well-defined.
its not well defined because not all the students/people like the teachers,so it is not well defined
Big people is a subjective term. This term may mean one thing to someone and another thing to other person. So this set is not well defined.
No, it is not well defined. "Big" means different things to different people. For example, to a toddler, a teenager is big, to an adult a teenager is not.
well defined
The description of a well defined set clealy states what is in the set. For example, "deciduous trees" is a set that only includes trees that are deciduous. No conifers or non-deciduous trees are in the set. "Tall trees" is not well defined because the members of the set depends on what "tall" means to different people. Well-defined sets can be illustrated by using pictures of what would be inside and outside a circle to show which would and would not be in the set.
If there exists even one single item for which you cannot say whether it is in the set or not, the set is not well defined.