Not if the hexagon is a regular hexagon with sides of the same length as the sides of the square.
Assuming that the hexagon is regular (all sides are the same), it can be comprised of 6 equilateral triangles of side length 6 (in this case). Area of a equilateral triangle is: (side length^2*√3)/4 Each triangle is of area: 62.353829072479572 inches square. 62.353829072479572*6 = 374.12297443487743 inches square approx.
In our example, the area of the equilateral triangle is 1/6 of the area of the regular hexagon
They need not be. A bigger triangle can have the same area as a small parallelogram.They need not be. A bigger triangle can have the same area as a small parallelogram.They need not be. A bigger triangle can have the same area as a small parallelogram.They need not be. A bigger triangle can have the same area as a small parallelogram.
It depends on the diameter of the circle and the width of the square, if they are the same then the answer is no. If you draw yourself a square then inscribe a circle with a radius of half the length of a side of the square, the circle will fit inside the square but the corners of the square will be outside the circle. Thus by inspection the area of the square is larger than the area of the circle.
Not if the hexagon is a regular hexagon with sides of the same length as the sides of the square.
The surface area of a hexagon is the same as its area. You will normally need to split the hexagon into triangles, find their area and sum these.
You decide how "alike" they are. A square has four sides; a hexagon has six. In a square, all sides have the same length, all angles have the same measure. In a hexagon, this may or may not be the case.
Assuming that the hexagon is regular (all sides are the same), it can be comprised of 6 equilateral triangles of side length 6 (in this case). Area of a equilateral triangle is: (side length^2*√3)/4 Each triangle is of area: 62.353829072479572 inches square. 62.353829072479572*6 = 374.12297443487743 inches square approx.
Very many if they are much smaller than the hexagon.If the square is to have the same length side as an equilateral hexagon and you are not allowed to cut the square then one.If you are allowed to cut the square but it (they) have to have the same length side as an equilateral hexagon then: about 2.6 [Exactly (3 * (Sqrt 3)) / 2 ]
In our example, the area of the equilateral triangle is 1/6 of the area of the regular hexagon
Assuming same side length, the the heptagon with 7 sides will have a greater area than a hexagon with 6 sides. If the side lengths are not equal, then: If the side of the hexagon is approx 1.183 times that of the heptagon then the areas are the same. Thus when the side of the hexagon is less than ~1.183 times that of the heptagon it will have a smaller area; conversely, if the side of the hexagon is more than ~1.183 times that of the heptagon it will have a larger area.
They need not be. A bigger triangle can have the same area as a small parallelogram.They need not be. A bigger triangle can have the same area as a small parallelogram.They need not be. A bigger triangle can have the same area as a small parallelogram.They need not be. A bigger triangle can have the same area as a small parallelogram.
It is not. If you draw yourself a square then inscribe a circle with a radius of half the length of a side of the square, the circle will fit inside the square but the corners of the square will be outside the circle. Thus by inspection the area of the square is larger than the area of the circle.
It depends on the diameter of the circle and the width of the square, if they are the same then the answer is no. If you draw yourself a square then inscribe a circle with a radius of half the length of a side of the square, the circle will fit inside the square but the corners of the square will be outside the circle. Thus by inspection the area of the square is larger than the area of the circle.
Square miles is bigger than miles square. Square miles refers to an area that is one mile by one mile, totaling one square mile. Miles square refers to an arrangement of miles in a square shape, which is not a standard unit of measurement.
Yes.