no it is not a recursive pattern because it isn't equal numbers.
5509.
Yes
Oh honey, that's not a recursive pattern, that's just a sequence of numbers increasing by 10 each time. It's like counting by tens but starting at 1 instead of 10. So, no recursion here, just some basic addition.
Yes. The next two numbers would be 49 & 58. This is because, from the first number, the pattern repeats by adding 10 then 9. So - 39+19 is 49, and 49+9=58.
no it is not a recursive pattern because it isn't equal numbers.
Yes. Each term is 10 more than the previous term.
a recursive pattern is when you always use the next term in the pattern... for example 4,(x2+1) 9,(x2+1) 19,(x2+1) 39,(x2+1) 79,(x2+1) 159
Oh honey, that pattern is as recursive as a broken record playing the same old tune. Each number just adds another 1 to the end, like a never-ending saga of ones. So yeah, it's recursive alright, just like that annoying jingle that gets stuck in your head for days.
5509.
Yes
Oh honey, that's not a recursive pattern, that's just a sequence of numbers increasing by 10 each time. It's like counting by tens but starting at 1 instead of 10. So, no recursion here, just some basic addition.
t(1) = 3 t(n) = t(n-1) + 2(n-2) for n = 2, 3, 4, ...
Yes. The next two numbers would be 49 & 58. This is because, from the first number, the pattern repeats by adding 10 then 9. So - 39+19 is 49, and 49+9=58.
The numbers are increasing by 10, then 9. 1 + 10 = 11, 11 + 9 = 20, and so on.
1) Recursive algorithms 2) Basic Principle 3) Analysis
t(n+1) = t(n) + 6 t(1) = -14