Less than 1 hour in a passenger jet, more than a week if you are walking.
Less than 10 minutes in a fighter aircraft (at Mach 2), more than a day if walking.
It has 3 pairs of walking legs.
Less than 20 minutes in a passenger aircraft, days if you are walking.
It is more than .2 of a mile.
Generally, the more intense the exercise, the more calories are burned. An exception to that rule of thumb seems to be with walking. Walking slowly actually burns more calories than moderately paced walking. Strolling along at two miles an hour typically burns more calories per minute or unit distance than walking at three or even four miles an hour. Increasing your pace to race-walking speeds, however, burns more calories than slow or moderate walking.
elephants do not run they can walk but there walking speed is more than a running human.
If you are walking, more than a month. So it depends on your speed/velocity.
Less than 1 hour in a passenger jet, more than a week if you are walking.
Less than 10 minutes in a fighter aircraft (at Mach 2), more than a day if walking.
You are walking a little more than 1/2 mile. That's very good. Congratulations! 1760 yards = mile
The person running would get more wetter then the person walking as you will be catching more rain than walking because you are running into more rain than if you were walking through it, but it does depend on the distance you are running or walking
No. You will burn many more calorie running the same distance than you would by walking.
After walking for twenty odd miles, Tom felt more weary than he ever thought possible. Harry insisted that he was much wearier than Tom.
It depends on your mode of transport. More than a day if you are walking, less than 5 minutes in a fighter aircraft.
Yes, It requirs more energy when walking on a slope than a flat surface
Walking is better than electronics because you get more exercise for your body.