m and n are two different letters there numbers are different also
2.45 is a fraction and there is no way to represent it as a whole number. The whole part of it is 2.
7/2 is a rational fraction and there is no sensible way to represent it as a whole number. There is no whole number in it.
2.79 is a mixed number in decimal form and there is no sensible way to represent it as a whole number. The whole part of it is 2.
-2.5 is a mixed number in decimal form and there is no sensible way to represent it as a whole number. The whole part of it is -2.
2.33 is a mixed number in decimal form and there is no sensible way to represent it as a whole number. The whole part of it is 2.
2.45 is a fraction and there is no way to represent it as a whole number. The whole part of it is 2.
yes they do and fractions also represent divide like if you had 1/2 you would have half of a whole!
7/2 is a rational fraction and there is no sensible way to represent it as a whole number. There is no whole number in it.
2.28 is a mixed number in decimal form and there is no sensible way to represent it as a whole number. The whole part of it is 2.
2.79 is a mixed number in decimal form and there is no sensible way to represent it as a whole number. The whole part of it is 2.
-2.5 is a mixed number in decimal form and there is no sensible way to represent it as a whole number. The whole part of it is -2.
2.33 is a mixed number in decimal form and there is no sensible way to represent it as a whole number. The whole part of it is 2.
7/2 is a rational fraction and there is no sensible way to represent it as a whole number.
2.1 is a mixed number in decimal form and there is no sensible way to represent it as a whole number. The whole part of it is 2.
Well, darling, 9 over 2 as a whole number is 4.5. And since whole numbers don't do decimals, you can't really represent 4.5 as a whole number. So, the answer to your question is simply "you can't."
2 ways
Fractions whose denominator is 1.