No.
In theory, infinite, non-recurring decimals can represent irrational number whereas fractions cannot do that. However, any non-recurring decimal number can be expressed for only a finite number of digits and so this theoretical difference cannot be attained in reality.
No
231
There is no decimal number for the binary number 13 because 13 cannot be a binary number.
When you convert this decimal number to the binary format, we have 111001001 that has 9 digits so 9bits is required to represent it in normal case. To convert decimals to binary visit http://acc6.its.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~gurwitz/core5/nav2tool.html
No.
In theory, infinite, non-recurring decimals can represent irrational number whereas fractions cannot do that. However, any non-recurring decimal number can be expressed for only a finite number of digits and so this theoretical difference cannot be attained in reality.
No
The binary number 10000000 represents the decimal 128
231
There is no decimal number for the binary number 13 because 13 cannot be a binary number.
10 digits.
The binary equivalent for the decimal number 23 is 10111
10111
A: A Binary code represent a binary number 0.1.2.4.8. etc. that is why it is called a weighted number
All I know is that when a number is negative, you convert the decimal into binary and if it is negative you put 1111 before the binary digits.