Your question is ill-posed. I have not come across a comparison dense-denser-densest.
The term "dense" is a topological property of a set:
A set A is dense in a set B, if for all y in B, there is an open set O of B, such that O and A have nonempty intersection.
The rational numbers are indeed dense in the set of real numbers with the standard topology. An open set containing a real number contains always a rational number.
Another way of saying it is that every real number can be approximated to any precision by rational numbers.
There are denser sets, if you are willing to consider more elements.
Suppose you construct a set consisting of the rational numbers plus all algebraic numbers. The set of algebraic numbers is also countable, but adding them, makes it obviously easier to approximate real numbers.
Can you perhaps construct a set less dense than the set of rational numbers?
Suppose we take the set of rational numbers without the element 0. Is this set still dense in the real numbers? Yes, because 0 can be approximated by 1/n, n>1.
In fact, you can remove finite number of rational numbers from the set of rational numbers and the resulting set will still be dense in the set of the real numbers.
No, the irrationals are more dense.
No. Fractions do not include irrational numbers. And although there are an infinite number of both rationals and irrationals, there are far more irrational numbers than rationals.
Integer numbers are a subset of real numbers. Real numbers may contain fractions.
You have it backwards. Integers are a subset of real numbers.
The real numbers, themselves. Every set is a subset of itself.
No, the irrationals are more dense.
No. Fractions do not include irrational numbers. And although there are an infinite number of both rationals and irrationals, there are far more irrational numbers than rationals.
No. Irrational numbers are denser.
Integer numbers are a subset of real numbers. Real numbers may contain fractions.
Every integers are real numbers.more precisely, integers are the subset of R, the set of real numbers.They are whole numbers with no decimals or fractions
Every integers are real numbers.more precisely, integers are the subset of R, the set of real numbers.They are whole numbers with no decimals or fractions
No because natural numbers are a subset of real numbers
You have it backwards. Integers are a subset of real numbers.
Integers are a subset of rational numbers which are a subset of real numbers which are a subset of complex numbers ...
I'm just telling you this ahead of time...but i'm not 100% sure with this answer..: fractions belong in the Rational Numbers
The real numbers, themselves. Every set is a subset of itself.
We can look at real numbers as the biggest set. Then some real numbers can be written as fractions. Those are rational numbers and that is a subset of reals. Some cannot be written as fractions and those are irrationals, another subset of the reals.Now those that are rational might have a denominator of 1 such as 3/1 of -3/1. These are a subset of the rationals and hence of the reals. They are called integers. Now if we look at 0 and the positive integers, these are the whole numbers. If we get rid of 0, these are the natural numbers.