both
Square numbers have too many factors to be prime.
The square root of any positive, non-square number will be both real and irrational.
Yes it is both
The number of digits in the square root of a number depends on the number. If it is a square number, the square root will have a finite number of digits. If the number is not a square number then the square root will be an irrational number with an infinite, non-repeating decimal representation. In both cases, the number of digits before the decimal point, in the square root of x will be the rounded value of 1+0.5*log10(x)
both
Square numbers have too many factors to be prime.
25 is both square and composite
It is both.13 is the square of +/- 3.6056, approx. However, since it is not the square of an integer, it is not a perfect square.It is also the square root of 169.
1 and 36
A square
This is an odd question. I hope you understand that a "square number" is not the opposite of a prime number. Zero is not a prime. Zero is a "square number" since 02=0.
when x is a negative number --- is a wrong answer since square root of a negative number is not defined. So x has to be zero or a positive number. The correct answer is that when x lies between 0 and 1 (with both limits excluded), its square root is greater than the number itself. Of course at both limits, the square root (assuming the positive square root - since a square root of a number can be positive or negative, both with the same absolute value) is the same as the number.
A square number is the product of a number multiplied by itself. It is square because both numbers are equal, just like the sides of a square. Example: 3x3=9 the square root of 9 is 3.
It is the smallest composite number that is both a perfect square and a perfect cube.
The square root of any positive, non-square number will be both real and irrational.
Yes it is both