The statement suggests that completely solving a problem can lead to complacency or a lack of further inquiry. When a problem is fully resolved, it may create a false sense of security, preventing deeper understanding or awareness of underlying issues. Additionally, it can stifle innovation and adaptability, as new challenges may arise that require ongoing attention and dynamic solutions. Ultimately, the worst outcome can be a lack of growth or learning from the problem-solving process itself.
true
The statement is neither true or false,"crossing a road from behind a road"simply does not make sense as a statement - how can you cross a road from behind a road!
True
that is false.
A false sense of security.
Can be used in the context of a "false sense of security". This is true esp. for coonstruction workers
to give people a false sense of security.
because they want to lull you into a false sense of security.
becausee pandass awesomee
No. It gives you false sense of security. It is anti viral drug.
Infatuation is a false sense of love.
The dog's friendliness lulled him into a false sense of security, until he was bitten. The low crime rate had lulled the homeowners into complacency, and so they left their doors unlocked. The boss lulled us into a false sense of security by saying that our jobs were safe and then let half the staff go.
They believed that Germany would never fire on civilians, so they were secure in traveling on the big ocean liners.
IT is False, False and so False.
IT is False, False and so False.
It give a false sense of security and animosity. Some people find comfort in this.