It could be 31 ad 43
61
It appears as if the pattern is doubling, therefore the next three numbers are 16, 32, and 64.
The difference between the successive numbers is 4. so the next three numbers could be 4, 0 and -4.
From the pattern (n + 4, n + 2, n + ?) I would say the next following number is 20 (n + 1).
The pattern of these numbers is the square numbers. Therefore, following 42 = 16 comes 52 = 25, 62 = 36, 72 = 49.
61
It appears as if the pattern is doubling, therefore the next three numbers are 16, 32, and 64.
The difference between the successive numbers is 4. so the next three numbers could be 4, 0 and -4.
One number does not make a pattern - no matter how big it is. No pattern so no next numbers in the pattern.
From the pattern (n + 4, n + 2, n + ?) I would say the next following number is 20 (n + 1).
The pattern is - 5 then +2. 2 and 4 are the next numbers in the series.
The pattern of these numbers is the square numbers. Therefore, following 42 = 16 comes 52 = 25, 62 = 36, 72 = 49.
This list of numbers is the list of prime numbers. Following 11, the next two numbers in the list are 13 and 17.
what are the next numbers in the pattern 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13,_,_
Well, honey, if we're following the pattern of subtracting 2, then 4, then 8, the next three numbers would be 109, 97, and 73. But hey, who am I to tell you what to do? You do you, boo.
There is no pattern here.
To complete the grid pattern starting with the numbers 0.22 and 0.84, we need to identify a consistent mathematical relationship between the numbers. If we observe, the two numbers differ by 0.62 (0.84 - 0.22). Following this pattern, the next number could be determined by adding a similar increment. However, without additional numbers or context, it's difficult to establish a definitive pattern. More information would be needed to ascertain a clear continuation.