No. Rejecting the Null Hypothesis means that there is a high degree of probability that it is not correct. This degree of probability is the critical level that you choose for the test statistic. However, there is still a small probability that the null hypothesis was correct.
It means that the experiment is consistent with the hypothesis. It adds to the credibility of the hypothesis.
It means tell them how your hypothesis was right or not.
F is the test statistic and H0 is the means are equal. A small test statistic such as 1 would mean you would fail to reject the null hypothesis that the means are equal.
Null hypothesis of a one-way ANOVA is that the means are equal. Alternate hypothesis a one-way ANOVA is that at least one of the means are different.
If you reject the null hypothesis when you shouldn't have, you've made a Type I error, which means you incorrectly concluded that there is an effect or difference when none exists. This can lead to misguided decisions or actions based on false information, potentially causing financial, social, or scientific repercussions. It's important to consider the significance level of your test and the context of the findings to minimize such errors. Additionally, replicating studies or using more stringent criteria can help mitigate this risk.
It means that the experiment is consistent with the hypothesis. It adds to the credibility of the hypothesis.
It means that she or he has to accept that the existing hypothesis appears to be true.
you do not need to reject a null hypothesis. If you don not that means "we retain the null hypothesis." we retain the null hypothesis when the p-value is large but you have to compare the p-values with alpha levels of .01,.1, and .05 (most common alpha levels). If p-value is above alpha levels then we fail to reject the null hypothesis. retaining the null hypothesis means that we have evidence that something is going to occur (depending on the question)
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
It means tell them how your hypothesis was right or not.
the hypothesis might be correct* * * * *The available evidence suggests that the observations were less likely to have been obtained from random variables that were distributed according to the null hypothesis than under the alternative hypothesis against which the null was tested.
When your hypothesis is correct, it is called a positive result or a successful outcome. This means that the data and evidence gathered during the experiment or study support your initial prediction or assumption.
Yes. The term means best guess. Data can prove that is not correct.
The null hypothesis cannot be accepted. Statistical tests only check whether differences in means are probably due to chance differences in sampling (the reason variance is so important). So if the p-value obtained by the data is larger than the significance level against which you are testing, we only fail to reject the null. If the p-value is lower than the significance level, the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
No, because 0.05 is a stricter alpha level than 0.10. 0.05 means you are allowing for 5% error, and 0.10 means 10% error. Therefore if you can not reject it at 0.10 then you can not reject it at either 0.05 or 0.01.