0
To show that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle DEF by the Angle-Side-Angle (ASA) criterion, you need to establish that two angles and the included side of triangle ABC are congruent to the corresponding two angles and the included side of triangle DEF. Specifically, you would need to demonstrate that ∠A is congruent to ∠D, ∠B is congruent to ∠E, and the side AB is congruent to side DE. Once these conditions are satisfied, you can conclude that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle DEF by the ASA theorem.
What else can I help you with?
What else would need to be congruent to show that ABCis congruent toXYZ by SAS?
The answer depends on what is already known about the two triangles.
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc is congruent to def by ASA?
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer. no correct
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc is congruent to xyz by aas?
To show that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle XYZ by the Angle-Angle-Side (AAS) criterion, you would need to establish that one pair of corresponding sides is congruent. Specifically, you need to demonstrate that one side of triangle ABC is congruent to the corresponding side of triangle XYZ, in addition to having two angles in triangle ABC congruent to two angles in triangle XYZ. This combination of two angles and the included side would satisfy the AAS condition for congruence.
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle abc congruent to xyz by asa?
To show that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle XYZ by the ASA (Angle-Side-Angle) criterion, we need to establish that two angles in triangle ABC are congruent to two angles in triangle XYZ, along with the side that is included between those angles being congruent. Specifically, if we have ∠A ≅ ∠X, ∠B ≅ ∠Y, and side AB ≅ XY, then the triangles can be concluded as congruent by ASA. Thus, we would need to confirm the congruence of these angles and the included side.
What else would need to be congruent to show that EFG congruent HIJ by SSS?
To prove that triangles EFG and HIJ are congruent by the Side-Side-Side (SSS) criterion, you would need to show that all three pairs of corresponding sides are congruent. Specifically, you must demonstrate that the lengths of side EF are equal to those of side HI, side FG is equal to side IJ, and side EG is equal to side HJ. Once these three pairs of sides are confirmed to be congruent, the triangles can be concluded as congruent by SSS.
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc congruent xyz by SAS?
__ - __ AC = XZ = is the similar sign
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc def by asa?
Angle "A" is congruent to Angle "D"
What else would need to be congruent to show that ABCis congruent toXYZ by SAS?
The answer depends on what is already known about the two triangles.
What else would need to congruent to show that abc equals pqr by sss?
That depends on which sides have not been proven congruent yet.
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc pqr by sss?
Bc= qr
What else would need to be congruent to show that efg pqr by asa?
bc yz
What else would need to be congruent to show that stu jkl by sas?
Su jL
What else would need to be congruent to show abc is congruent to def by AAS?
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle abc is congruent to xyz by SAS?
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc xyz by sas?
Line segment BC is congruent to Line Segment YZ
What else would need to be congruent to show that STU congruent JKL by sas?
We don't know what has already been proven congruent, sowe're in no position to be able to say what elseis required.
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle abc equals xyz by sas?
bh=ws
