That already is a decimal.
Chat with our AI personalities
Yes, However, it is not defined that way. It is defined as a number that cannot be expressed precisely as a ratio of two real numbers (a fraction). But that is equivalent to a non-repeating decimal.
"41 and 50" is a list of two whole numbers. There's no procedure defined for making a decimal out of two whole numbers.
A decimal number is a way of representing a number in such a way that the place value of any digit is ten times that of the digit in the place to its right. If it does not contain a fractional part then the decimal representation does not require a decimal point.
decimals are not used in roman numerals,they are not defined and hence decimal expansion of 6.09 doesn't occur.
That doesn't make sense. "Predecessor" and "successor" are defined for whole numbers, not for decimal numbers.