Yes, However, it is not defined that way. It is defined as a number that cannot be expressed precisely as a ratio of two real numbers (a fraction). But that is equivalent to a non-repeating decimal.
That already is a decimal.
yes, it is irrational. An irrational number can defined as a number that can not be expressed as a finite nor a repeating decimal.
The circumference is defined by 2* PI * radius Your calculation is therefore correct, but is depends upon what number of decimal places you need to quote your answer. The proper answer to two decimal places is 81.68.
e is defined as the limit of (1 + 1/x)^x as x approaches infinity. It is an irrational number. The decimal approximation is 2.71828183
Yes, However, it is not defined that way. It is defined as a number that cannot be expressed precisely as a ratio of two real numbers (a fraction). But that is equivalent to a non-repeating decimal.
That already is a decimal.
yes, it is irrational. An irrational number can defined as a number that can not be expressed as a finite nor a repeating decimal.
It is a number with a decimal point. It is not necessarily a decimal number because 24 (no decimal pont) is a decimal number.It is a number with a decimal point. It is not necessarily a decimal number because 24 (no decimal pont) is a decimal number.It is a number with a decimal point. It is not necessarily a decimal number because 24 (no decimal pont) is a decimal number.It is a number with a decimal point. It is not necessarily a decimal number because 24 (no decimal pont) is a decimal number.
Oh, dude, 12.5 is like totally not an even number because it's got that pesky little 0.5 hanging out at the end. Even numbers are like those cool kids who get picked first for dodgeball, all whole numbers with no decimal nonsense. So yeah, 12.5 is definitely an oddball in the even number club.
No, 0.326 is not a whole number. Whole numbers are defined by being integers, or numbers without a value (other than 0) past its decimal place.
The circumference is defined by 2* PI * radius Your calculation is therefore correct, but is depends upon what number of decimal places you need to quote your answer. The proper answer to two decimal places is 81.68.
e is defined as the limit of (1 + 1/x)^x as x approaches infinity. It is an irrational number. The decimal approximation is 2.71828183
No. A whole number is a number with no fractional (decimal) part. Therefore a decimal number can not be a whole number. Another view: 35.0 is a whole number AND a decimal. The fact that a number is a decimal does not automatically require it to have a fractional part. Even 35 is a decimal number (without a decimal point).
A decimal number is not an integer. An integer is a number that is not a fraction, and decimal numbers are decimal fractions.
27.9 IS a decimal number. You can tell it is a decimal number because it has a decimal point (.).
1.30 is a decimal number