Yes, However, it is not defined that way. It is defined as a number that cannot be expressed precisely as a ratio of two real numbers (a fraction). But that is equivalent to a non-repeating decimal.
That already is a decimal.
yes, it is irrational. An irrational number can defined as a number that can not be expressed as a finite nor a repeating decimal.
The circumference is defined by 2* PI * radius Your calculation is therefore correct, but is depends upon what number of decimal places you need to quote your answer. The proper answer to two decimal places is 81.68.
e is defined as the limit of (1 + 1/x)^x as x approaches infinity. It is an irrational number. The decimal approximation is 2.71828183
Yes, However, it is not defined that way. It is defined as a number that cannot be expressed precisely as a ratio of two real numbers (a fraction). But that is equivalent to a non-repeating decimal.
That already is a decimal.
yes, it is irrational. An irrational number can defined as a number that can not be expressed as a finite nor a repeating decimal.
It is a number with a decimal point. It is not necessarily a decimal number because 24 (no decimal pont) is a decimal number.It is a number with a decimal point. It is not necessarily a decimal number because 24 (no decimal pont) is a decimal number.It is a number with a decimal point. It is not necessarily a decimal number because 24 (no decimal pont) is a decimal number.It is a number with a decimal point. It is not necessarily a decimal number because 24 (no decimal pont) is a decimal number.
No, 0.326 is not a whole number. Whole numbers are defined by being integers, or numbers without a value (other than 0) past its decimal place.
The circumference is defined by 2* PI * radius Your calculation is therefore correct, but is depends upon what number of decimal places you need to quote your answer. The proper answer to two decimal places is 81.68.
e is defined as the limit of (1 + 1/x)^x as x approaches infinity. It is an irrational number. The decimal approximation is 2.71828183
No. A whole number is a number with no fractional (decimal) part. Therefore a decimal number can not be a whole number. Another view: 35.0 is a whole number AND a decimal. The fact that a number is a decimal does not automatically require it to have a fractional part. Even 35 is a decimal number (without a decimal point).
A decimal number is not an integer. An integer is a number that is not a fraction, and decimal numbers are decimal fractions.
27.9 IS a decimal number. You can tell it is a decimal number because it has a decimal point (.).
1.30 is a decimal number
A number with two decimal points cannot be a decimal number.