Leave as it is because 265 is already an integer which is a whole number without decimals or fractions.
265 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 265/1. You can then calculate equivalent rational fractions if you multiply both, its numerator and denominator, by any non-zero integer.
Irrational numbers can't be expressed as fractions.
Yes.
265 = 265/1
Leave as it is because 265 is already an integer which is a whole number without decimals or fractions.
265 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 265/1. You can then calculate equivalent rational fractions if you multiply both, its numerator and denominator, by any non-zero integer.
132.5
To figure out 0.265 as a fraction, you must put 265 over a fraction bar and 1,000 under the fraction bar, and reduce the fraction from there.0.265=265/1,000=53/500
All terminating decimals can be written as fractions.
This could be written as (265 / 2) ■
decimals
Irrational numbers can't be expressed as fractions.
Jacob Sherman has written: 'On the numerators of the convergents of the Stieltjes continued fractions' -- subject(s): Continued fractions
I think it 's fractions yea fractions
-2.65 = -265/100.
Charles Sweeton has written: 'Fractions'