Pretty badly formulated question! Try to express yourself more carefully if you want good answers to your questions. Otherwise no one knows what you're even asking, like here.
So let me guess:
2x + 3y + 2(x-y) - 3x seems to be the expression
Let's simplify this thing:
2x + 3y + 2x - 2y - 3x
that's just
2x + 2x - 3x + 3y - 2y
or, using "the distributive property",
(2 + 2 - 3)x + (3 - 2)y
equals
x + y
2(x+6)=2x+12. This is an example of the distributive property.
Yes, the expression 3(2x + 4) uses the distributive property. When applying the distributive property, you multiply each term inside the parentheses by 3, resulting in 6x + 12. However, the expression 5x + 4 does not equal 6x + 12, so they are not equivalent. Therefore, while the first part uses the distributive property, the two expressions are not the same.
No. It is a meaningless equation. You may have intended to say: 2 times the sum of x and g is equal to 2x plus 2g.
7x = 4x+2x+1xSo 7x/2 = 4x/2 + 2x/2 + x/2 (by the distributive property of division over addition) = 2x + x + x/2
2x(a+3b)=2xa+6xb
6x + 15
2(x+6)=2x+12. This is an example of the distributive property.
2x(3x-1) = 6x2-2x because of the distributive property.
2x(4+8) = 2x(4) and 2x(8)
No. It is a meaningless equation. You may have intended to say: 2 times the sum of x and g is equal to 2x plus 2g.
6x2-2x
7x = 4x+2x+1xSo 7x/2 = 4x/2 + 2x/2 + x/2 (by the distributive property of division over addition) = 2x + x + x/2
2x(a+3b)=2xa+6xb
The distributive property is when you take you number is share it with all the other numbers in the parenthesis. An example is x(2 + 3) = 2x + 3X.
Zero. The sum of anything and it's opposite is zero, that's how an opposite is defined. In this case, the opposite of 2x + 1 is -(2x + 1) = -2x - 1 by the distributive property. Adding like terms, 2x + -2x + 1 +-1 = 0 + 0 = 0.
This uses the distributive property.
2(x - 3) = 2x - 6.