Prime number : 6.5 factor: 13, 3,
13
Neither 39 nor 27272 is prime. 39 can be divided by 3 and 27272 can be divided by 2. They both have at least one factor besides 1 and the number themselves. They are composite. The digit in 39 that is prime is 3. The digit in 27272 that is prime is 7.
39 is not a prime number.
To write 39 as a product of primes, you need to factor it into its prime components. Start by dividing 39 by the smallest prime number, which is 3: (39 \div 3 = 13). Since 13 is also a prime number, the prime factorization of 39 is (3 \times 13). Thus, 39 can be expressed as the product of primes: (3 \times 13).
13 is a prime number and 39 isint a prime number
The lowest prime number that will divide evenly into 39 is 3, so 3 is a prime factor of 39. 39/3 = 13, and 13 is a prime number that is also a factor of 39. The prime factorization of 39 is 3 x 13.
13
3 and 13
No, 39 is not a factor of 43. Since 43 is a prime number, its only factors are 1 and 43.
No, 39 isn't prime.
Neither 39 nor 27272 is prime. 39 can be divided by 3 and 27272 can be divided by 2. They both have at least one factor besides 1 and the number themselves. They are composite. The digit in 39 that is prime is 3. The digit in 27272 that is prime is 7.
Not.
No, 13 and 39 are not relatively prime. 13 is a factor of 39.
GCF of a prime number and a composite number is 1 if the composite number is not a multiple of the prime number. It is clear here that 39 is not a multiple of 47, therefore GCF(47, 39) = 1.
Here is a factor tree of 39: 39 3 x 13 Since these are prime numbers, the factor tree is finished. The prime factors of 39 are 3 and 13.
39 is not a prime; it is a composite number.
13 is the prime number of 39