13
Neither 39 nor 27272 is prime. 39 can be divided by 3 and 27272 can be divided by 2. They both have at least one factor besides 1 and the number themselves. They are composite. The digit in 39 that is prime is 3. The digit in 27272 that is prime is 7.
39 is not a prime number.
13 is a prime number and 39 isint a prime number
39 and 45 are not relatively prime because they have 3 as a common factor. Relatively prime numbers have no common factor greater than 1.
The lowest prime number that will divide evenly into 39 is 3, so 3 is a prime factor of 39. 39/3 = 13, and 13 is a prime number that is also a factor of 39. The prime factorization of 39 is 3 x 13.
13
3 and 13
No, 39 is not a factor of 43. Since 43 is a prime number, its only factors are 1 and 43.
No, 39 isn't prime.
Neither 39 nor 27272 is prime. 39 can be divided by 3 and 27272 can be divided by 2. They both have at least one factor besides 1 and the number themselves. They are composite. The digit in 39 that is prime is 3. The digit in 27272 that is prime is 7.
Not.
GCF of a prime number and a composite number is 1 if the composite number is not a multiple of the prime number. It is clear here that 39 is not a multiple of 47, therefore GCF(47, 39) = 1.
No, 13 and 39 are not relatively prime. 13 is a factor of 39.
Here is a factor tree of 39: 39 3 x 13 Since these are prime numbers, the factor tree is finished. The prime factors of 39 are 3 and 13.
A factor can or cannot be a prime number Ex: 2 is the factor of all other even numbers its a prime number but 9 is a factor of 18 and its not a prime number A prime is a factor but a factor being a prime number varies
13 is the prime number of 39