yeah ma.
Yes.
The difference is that rational numbers can be expressed as fractions whereas irrational numbers can not be expressed as fractions.
It could be either.
No, it is always irrational.
The difference can be rational or irrational.5 + sqrt(3) and 2 + sqrt(3) are both irrational numbers but their difference is[5 + sqrt(3)] - [2 + sqrt(3)] = 3, which is rational.
rational and irrational
There is no number which can be rational and irrational so there is no point in asking "how".
Yes.
The difference is that rational numbers can be expressed as fractions whereas irrational numbers can not be expressed as fractions.
It could be either.
No, it is always irrational.
4.6 is rational.
Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction.
The difference can be rational or irrational.5 + sqrt(3) and 2 + sqrt(3) are both irrational numbers but their difference is[5 + sqrt(3)] - [2 + sqrt(3)] = 3, which is rational.
10.01 is Rational. IRRATIONAL are those decimals, which recur to infinity and there is NO regular order in the decimal digits. pi = 3.141592..... is Irrational But 3.333333..... is rational , because the decimal digits are in a regular order. Definitely an irrational number cannot be converted into a rational number/ratio/fraction/quotient. So 10.01 is rational because it can be converted to a ratio/fraction/quotient of 10 1/100 or 1001/100
Rational
-- There's an infinite number of rational numbers. -- There's an infinite number of irrational numbers. -- There are more irrational numbers than rational numbers. -- The difference between the number of irrational numbers and the number of rational numbers is infinite.