0
The difference in resistance between two points, p and q, typically refers to the electrical resistance encountered when current flows between these points in a circuit. This resistance can be affected by factors such as the material properties, length, cross-sectional area of the conductor, and temperature. If p and q are part of a circuit, the resistance can be calculated using Ohm's Law (R = V/I), where R is resistance, V is voltage, and I is current. The total resistance between p and q may also depend on how other resistive components are arranged in the circuit (series or parallel).
What else can I help you with?
Is not(p and q) equal to (not p) or q?
No, the statement "not(p and q)" is not equal to "(not p) or q." According to De Morgan's laws, "not(p and q)" is equivalent to "not p or not q." This means that if either p is false or q is false (or both), the expression "not(p and q)" will be true. Therefore, the two expressions represent different logical conditions.
Is the square root of pq irrational where p and q are primes?
Only if p and q are DIFFERENT primes.
What is Difference between a rational number and irrational number?
A rational number can be expressed as a ratio in the form, p/q, where p and q are integers and q > 0.
What is the sum or difference of p and q?
The sum of p and q means (p+q). The difference of p and q means (p-q).
CAN YOU SHOW ANY OTHER FRACTION BETWEEN 0AND1?
Yes. Any number of the form p/q in which 0 < p < q will do.
If B is between P and Q?
If B is between P and Q, then: P<B<Q
What is the relationship between p and q in the statement "p implies q"?
In the statement "p implies q," the relationship between p and q is that if p is true, then q must also be true.
What is the theory of kelvin's double bridge experiment?
Theory: - Kelvin's bridge is a modification of whetstone's bridge and always used in measurement of low resistance. It uses two sets of ratio arms and the four terminal resistances for the low resistance consider the ckt. As shown in fig. The first set of ratio P and Q. The second set of ratio arms are p and q is used to connected to galvanometer to a pt d at an Approx. potential between points m and n to eliminate the effects of connecting lead of resistance r between the known std. resistance 's' and unknown resistance R .The ratio P/Q is made equal to p/q. under balanced condition there is no current flowing through galvanometer which means voltage drop between a and b, Eab equal to the voltage drop between a and c, Eamd. Now Ead=P/P+Q ; Eab=I[R+S+[(p+q)r/p+q+r]] ------------(1) Eamd= I[R+ p/p+q[ (p+q)r/p+q+r]] ---------------------(2) For zero deflection->Eac=Ead [ P/P+Q]I[R+S+{(p+q)r/p+q+r}]=I[R+pr/p+q+r] ----(3) Now, if P/Q=p/q Then equation… (3) becomes R=P/Q=S ------------------------------------------------------(4) Equation (4) is the usual working equation. For the Kelvin's Double Bridge .It indicates the resistance of connecting lead r. It has no effect on measurement provided that the two sets of ratio arms have equal ratios. Equation (3) is useful however as it shows the error that is introduced in case the ratios are not exactly equal. It indicates that it is desirable to keep r as small as possible in order to minimize the error in case there is a diff. between the ratio P/Q and p/q. R=P/QS
If p q and q r what is the relationship between the values p and r?
Ifp < q and q < r, what is the relationship between the values p and r? ________________p
Is the statement P q valid?
No, it is not valid because there is no operator between P and q.
What is the relationship between the values p and q plotted on the number line below?
p=q
What are the different types of statements?
there are 32 types of thesis statements possible
Is the square root of pq irrational where p and q are primes?
Only if p and q are DIFFERENT primes.
What type of operator can be used to determine whether a specific relationship that exists between two values?
The relational operators: ==, !=, =.p == q; // evaluates true if the value of p and q are equal, false otherwise.p != q; // evaluates true of the value of p and q are not equal, false otherwise.p < q; // evaluates true if the value of p is less than q, false otherwise.p q; // evaluates true if the value of p is greater than q, false otherwise.p >= q; // evaluates true of the value of p is greater than or equal to q, false otherwiseNote that all of these expressions can be expressed logically in terms of the less than operator alone:p == q is the same as NOT (p < q) AND NOT (q < p)p != q is the same as (p < q) OR (q < p)p < q is the same as p < q (obviously)p q is the same as (q < p)p >= q is the same as NOT (p < q)
What is betweenness of points using collinear points M P and Q?
If M P and Q are collinear and MP plus PQ equals MQ then P is between M and Q.
If p q and q r then p r. Converse statement B.A syllogism C.Contrapositive statement D.Inverse statement?
Converse: If p r then p q and q rContrapositive: If not p r then not (p q and q r) = If not p r then not p q or not q r Inverse: If not p q and q r then not p r = If not p q or not q r then not p r
What is P and q implies not not p or r if and only if q?
The statement "P and Q implies not not P or R if and only if Q" can be expressed in logical terms as ( (P \land Q) \implies (\neg \neg P \lor R) \iff Q ). This can be simplified, as (\neg \neg P) is equivalent to (P), leading to ( (P \land Q) \implies (P \lor R) \iff Q ). The implication essentially states that if both (P) and (Q) are true, then either (P) or (R) must also hold true, and this equivalence holds true only if (Q) is true. The overall expression reflects a relationship between the truth values of (P), (Q), and (R).
