(99,90) (105,75)
The answers are usually always valid. What may or may not be valid are your assumptions about the underlying model. Also, the number of times the results should be similar depends on the number of possible outcomes and the variability in the outcomes. For example, if you spin a fair spinner with 12 equal segments, then the probability of similar results is less than likely.
What do you mean by this? 36 inches? Feet? Centimeters? You need to be a bit more specific to receive a valid answer.
The main difference between the Rayleigh-Ritz method (RRM) and the finite element method lies in the definition of the basis functions. For FEM, these are element-related functions, whereas for RRM these are valid for the whole domain and have to fit the boundary conditions. The Rayleigh-Ritz method for homogeneous boundary conditions leads to the same discretized equations as the Galerkin method of weighted residuals.
A scientific theory is a hypothesis that has been repeatedly tested and still seems to be valid. These theories are tested by using the scientific method.
No, the scientific method can be uncontrolled to for it to be valid.
When the value indicated by the circle is a valid value for the inequality.
If duress can be shown, no it would not be legal. Proving it can be difficult but it is not impossible.
Allan mangubat is the answer
to make sure its valid
(99,90) (105,75)
good
No, this is not a general valid method.
No it does not, but it pretends to to make you think that what it is saying is valid.
False. A method with the same signature in both the superclass and its subclass is known as method overriding, and is a valid concept in Java.
The most valid answer is "I don't know"
No, if scientists were unable to replicate Thomson's method, his conclusion would not necessarily still be considered valid. Replicability is a fundamental aspect of the scientific method, and if others cannot reproduce his results, it may cast doubt on the validity of his original findings.