30 tens does not equal 3000.
Well, honey, let me break it down for you. 30 ones is definitely not the same as 30 tens. In the first scenario, you've got 30 individual ones, while in the second, you've got 3 groups of 10. So, to put it simply, they may have the same numerical value, but they sure ain't the same thing.
118
127
20 and 30
30 tens does not equal 3000.
No, 3 tens is equal to 30 and is less than 100 No, 3 tens is equal to 30 and is less than 100
30. 4 tens = 4 * 10 = 40 10 less than this = 40 - 10 = 30. We could also think of this as 10 (which is 1 ten) less than 4 tens must equal 3 tens (30).
3000 of them.
The number that has 3 tens and 2 ones is 32. In the base-10 number system, each place value represents a power of 10, so the digit in the tens place is multiplied by 10 and the digit in the ones place remains as it is. Therefore, 3 tens is equal to 30 and 2 ones is equal to 2, making the number 32.
Oh, what a happy little question! Yes, my friend, 30 tens do indeed equal 300. Just imagine each group of ten as a lovely little bundle of joy, and when you have 30 of them, you have a grand total of 300. Keep up the good work, you're doing great!
3000/x = 30 3000 = 30x 3000/30 = x 100 = x
my answer is 300
Well, honey, let me break it down for you. 30 ones is definitely not the same as 30 tens. In the first scenario, you've got 30 individual ones, while in the second, you've got 3 groups of 10. So, to put it simply, they may have the same numerical value, but they sure ain't the same thing.
3 tens is equal to the number 30, and 3 ones is equal to the number 3.So, 3 tens and 3 ones is 33; and 67 minus 33 (or 67 less33) is 34.You could also look at the number 67 and see that it is 6 tens and 7 ones. Then it is easier to say "6 tens and 7 ones minus 3 tens and 3 ones = 34"because:6 tens minus 3 tens = 3 tens, and 7 ones minus 3 ones = four ones.3 tens and four ones = 34
two hundred and thirty23 x 10 = 230
300 three hundred