To find the HCF of two numbers you first need to write them as the product of their prime factors: 52 = 2x2x13 96 = 2x2x2x2x2x3 The next step is to identify any common prime factors. In this case, both numbers have two 2s as prime factors. Multiply these and you get: 2x2 = 4 Thus the HCF of 52 and 96 is 4.
How about: 29+67 = 96
96
There are no such two prime numbers, as 167 is a prime number itself.
In terms of exponents: 25*3 = 96
29950795999/pi
25 x 3 = 96
To find the HCF of two numbers you first need to write them as the product of their prime factors: 52 = 2x2x13 96 = 2x2x2x2x2x3 The next step is to identify any common prime factors. In this case, both numbers have two 2s as prime factors. Multiply these and you get: 2x2 = 4 Thus the HCF of 52 and 96 is 4.
No, they are not relatively prime.
Prime numbers are multiplied together in the same way as any integers may be multiplied together.
To work out the hcf of two numbers, you first need to break them down into their prime factors. In this case you'd get: 54 = 2x3x3x3 96 = 2x2x2x2x2x3 The next step is to identify any common prime factors. In this case, both numbers have a 2 and a 3 as prime factors. Multiply these together and you get 6. Therefore the HCF of 54 and 96 is 6.
96 = 2x2x2x2x2x3
How about: 29+67 = 96
Write the numbers out in their prime factorisations in power format, then multiply together the highest power of all the prime numbers taken across both the numbers:24 = 23 x 396 = 25 x 3lcm = 25 x 3 = 96Alternatively, write out the multiples of the numbers, and spot the first common one:24: 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, ...96: 96, 192, ...(You may notice that 96 = 4 x 24 so the lcm will be 96.)
96
prime numbers, co-prime numbers
There are no such two prime numbers, as 167 is a prime number itself.