It could be a random variable with a discrete uniform distribution over the range 1 to 6.
It is 1/2 if it is a fair number cube which is rolled once.
A cube is any number multiplied by itself three times, eg 2 cubed = 2³ = 2×2×2 = 8; 1.5³ = 1.5×1.5×1.5 = 3.375 A perfect cube is an integer (whole number) that is the cube of an integer, eg 8 is a perfect cube as it is 2 cubed, but 9 is not a perfect cube as 9 = 2.08008382...³
The number 784 is not a perfect cube. A perfect cube is defined as a number that can be expressed as the cube of an integer (i.e., (n^3) for some integer (n)). The cube root of 784 is approximately 9.24, which is not an integer, indicating that 784 cannot be represented as a whole number cubed.
It is 0.722... recurring.
No, 30 is not a perfect cube. A perfect cube is a number that can be expressed as the cube of an integer, such as (1^3 = 1), (2^3 = 8), or (3^3 = 27). The cube root of 30 is approximately 3.11, which is not an integer, confirming that 30 cannot be written as the cube of any whole number.
It is 1/2 if it is a fair number cube which is rolled once.
Assuming it is a 6-sided number cube, it would be 6.
A cube is any number multiplied by itself three times, eg 2 cubed = 2³ = 2×2×2 = 8; 1.5³ = 1.5×1.5×1.5 = 3.375 A perfect cube is an integer (whole number) that is the cube of an integer, eg 8 is a perfect cube as it is 2 cubed, but 9 is not a perfect cube as 9 = 2.08008382...³
The number 784 is not a perfect cube. A perfect cube is defined as a number that can be expressed as the cube of an integer (i.e., (n^3) for some integer (n)). The cube root of 784 is approximately 9.24, which is not an integer, indicating that 784 cannot be represented as a whole number cubed.
It is 0.722... recurring.
If by cube you mean perfect cube (a cube of an integer), then no, and the nearest perfect cube is 81.
7
No, 30 is not a perfect cube. A perfect cube is a number that can be expressed as the cube of an integer, such as (1^3 = 1), (2^3 = 8), or (3^3 = 27). The cube root of 30 is approximately 3.11, which is not an integer, confirming that 30 cannot be written as the cube of any whole number.
The answer depends on how many times it is rolled.
If a standard number cube or die is rolled, the probability that a 4 does not land face up is five out of six, or (six minus one) out of six.
No, 5 is not a cube number. A cube number is the result of an integer multiplied by itself twice (n × n × n). The cube numbers closest to 5 are 1 (1³) and 8 (2³).
A square number is the product of an integer multiplied by itself, while a cube number is the product of an integer multiplied by itself twice. Between 50 and 100, the square numbers are 64 (8²) and 81 (9²), and the only cube number is 64 (4³). Thus, both a square and cube number within that range is 64.