It could be a random variable with a discrete uniform distribution over the range 1 to 6.
It is 1/2 if it is a fair number cube which is rolled once.
A cube is any number multiplied by itself three times, eg 2 cubed = 2³ = 2×2×2 = 8; 1.5³ = 1.5×1.5×1.5 = 3.375 A perfect cube is an integer (whole number) that is the cube of an integer, eg 8 is a perfect cube as it is 2 cubed, but 9 is not a perfect cube as 9 = 2.08008382...³
The number 784 is not a perfect cube. A perfect cube is defined as a number that can be expressed as the cube of an integer (i.e., (n^3) for some integer (n)). The cube root of 784 is approximately 9.24, which is not an integer, indicating that 784 cannot be represented as a whole number cubed.
It is 0.722... recurring.
The answer depends on how many times it is rolled.
It is 1/2 if it is a fair number cube which is rolled once.
Assuming it is a 6-sided number cube, it would be 6.
No, 5 is not a cube number. A cube number is the result of an integer multiplied by itself twice (n × n × n). The cube numbers closest to 5 are 1 (1³) and 8 (2³).
A cube is any number multiplied by itself three times, eg 2 cubed = 2³ = 2×2×2 = 8; 1.5³ = 1.5×1.5×1.5 = 3.375 A perfect cube is an integer (whole number) that is the cube of an integer, eg 8 is a perfect cube as it is 2 cubed, but 9 is not a perfect cube as 9 = 2.08008382...³
The number 784 is not a perfect cube. A perfect cube is defined as a number that can be expressed as the cube of an integer (i.e., (n^3) for some integer (n)). The cube root of 784 is approximately 9.24, which is not an integer, indicating that 784 cannot be represented as a whole number cubed.
It is 0.722... recurring.
If by cube you mean perfect cube (a cube of an integer), then no, and the nearest perfect cube is 81.
7
The answer depends on how many times it is rolled.
If a standard number cube or die is rolled, the probability that a 4 does not land face up is five out of six, or (six minus one) out of six.
A number cube is a six sided figure so I'm going to go with 0%
an integer