.0123 is closer to zero than .023.
If you round it to hundredths, it would be .01 or .02. Its easier to think of this way. 1 is closer to zero than 2.
0123 if you can have zero at the front if not then 1023
0132 or 1234 0123 or without 0 at front = 1023
obviously closer to 1
The number 0 is closer to 0 than 1. This is because the distance between 0 and 0 is 0, while the distance between 1 and 0 is 1. In mathematical terms, the absolute value of 0 minus 0 is 0, while the absolute value of 1 minus 0 is 1. Therefore, 0 is closer to 0 than 1.
To determine if an improper fraction is closer to 0 or 1, you can convert it to a mixed number. If the fraction is closer to 0, the whole number part of the mixed number will be 0, and if it is closer to 1, the whole number part will be 1. For example, if you have the improper fraction 5/7, when converted to a mixed number it becomes 0 5/7, indicating it is closer to 0 than 1.
0123 if you can have zero at the front if not then 1023
.03 is closer to 0.
0132 or 1234 0123 or without 0 at front = 1023
obviously closer to 1
No, 0.3 is larger than 0.03 (3 Hundredths). On the number line 0.03 is closer to 0 than 0.3.
To determine if an improper fraction is closer to 0 or 1, you can convert it to a mixed number. If the fraction is closer to 0, the whole number part of the mixed number will be 0, and if it is closer to 1, the whole number part will be 1. For example, if you have the improper fraction 5/7, when converted to a mixed number it becomes 0 5/7, indicating it is closer to 0 than 1.
0.05 is closer to 0 than 0.5 is.
2/5 is less than half so would be closer to 0 than 1.
2/5 is closer to 0.
-1 because its closer to 0.
2
6