The one in which the square of the biggest one is equal to
the sum of the squares of the other two is.
You seem to have squashed the numbers together but 4, 3 and 5 make up a Pythagorean triple.
No, the numbers 16, 30, and 34 do not form a Pythagorean triple. For a set of three numbers to be a Pythagorean triple, the sum of the squares of the two smaller numbers must equal the square of the largest number. In this case, (16^2 + 30^2 = 256 + 900 = 1156), while (34^2 = 1156), which satisfies the condition, but it should be noted that for Pythagorean triples, the numbers are typically expressed in the form (a^2 + b^2 = c^2) with (c) being the largest. Hence, 16, 30, and 34 can be considered a Pythagorean triple.
Square them and compare the largest answer with the sum of the other two.
If you mean 3, 4 and 5 then yes it is a Pythagorean triple
6, 8, and 10 is simply a scaled up version of a 3,4,5 triangle (simply double each side). Since 3,4,5 is a Pythagorean triple, so is the scaled up triangle. Alternatively, since 6, 8, and 10 are integers (whole numbers) that fulfill the Pythagorean theorem (62 + 82 = 102 ), they are a Pythagorean triple.
You seem to have squashed the numbers together but 4, 3 and 5 make up a Pythagorean triple.
The Pythagorean thereom is a^2+b^2=c^2. So, you can tell if they are a Pythagorean triple by seeing if the two smaller numbers squared equal the largest number squared. Example. Are 3,4, and 5 a Pythagorean triple? 3^2= 9. 4^2= 16. 5^2= 25. 9+16=25, so they are a triple.
3,4,5 1,2,3 these are sets of pythagorean triples
No, the numbers 16, 30, and 34 do not form a Pythagorean triple. For a set of three numbers to be a Pythagorean triple, the sum of the squares of the two smaller numbers must equal the square of the largest number. In this case, (16^2 + 30^2 = 256 + 900 = 1156), while (34^2 = 1156), which satisfies the condition, but it should be noted that for Pythagorean triples, the numbers are typically expressed in the form (a^2 + b^2 = c^2) with (c) being the largest. Hence, 16, 30, and 34 can be considered a Pythagorean triple.
Square them and compare the largest answer with the sum of the other two.
If you mean 3, 4 and 5 then yes it is a Pythagorean triple
Nearly but not quite a Pythagorean triple
No, the multiple of any random triple is not a Pythagorean triple.
6, 8, and 10 is simply a scaled up version of a 3,4,5 triangle (simply double each side). Since 3,4,5 is a Pythagorean triple, so is the scaled up triangle. Alternatively, since 6, 8, and 10 are integers (whole numbers) that fulfill the Pythagorean theorem (62 + 82 = 102 ), they are a Pythagorean triple.
Pythagorean triple
There are infinitely many Pythagorean triples. To find a Pythagorean triple take two positive integers x, y with x > y. A Pythagorean triple is of the form x2 - y2, 2xy, x2 + y2.
for numbers a,b, and c to be a pythagorean triple, they must obey the rule a^2+b^2=c^2. This is not true of 3 numbers picked at random of course.