the answer is -8<x<8.
Yes. It is THE solution.
64-3 equals = 61
16
No, because 8x8 is 64, not 16. The solution is 4 or -4.
the answer is -8<x<8.
"Solution" means the number that 'x' must be, in order to make the statement true.The solution to the equation " x = 64 " is . . . . . x = 64
16y -64 as an inequality = -48
Yes. It is THE solution.
64-3 equals = 61
Let's set up an inequality to represent all possible values of the width (w) of the rectangle given the information provided. The length of the rectangle is three times its width, so the length (L) can be expressed as L = 3w. The perimeter (P) of a rectangle is given by the formula: P = 2(L + w). The perimeter is greater than 64 centimeters, so we have P > 64. Now, substitute the expression for L from step 1 into the perimeter formula from step 2: P = 2(3w + w) Simplify the expression inside the parentheses: P = 2(4w) P = 8w Now, we have the perimeter in terms of the width: P = 8w. We already know that P > 64, so we can write the inequality: 8w > 64 To isolate w, divide both sides of the inequality by 8: w > 64 / 8 w > 8 So, the inequality representing all possible values of the width (w) is: w > 8 This means that the width of the rectangle must be greater than 8 centimeters for the perimeter to be greater than 64 centimeters.
To find what number multiplied by 12 equals 64, you would divide 64 by 12. 64 divided by 12 equals 5.33 recurring. Therefore, 5.33 recurring times 12 equals 64.
How about: 8*8 = 64
16
0.1094
64 = 1024
No, because 8x8 is 64, not 16. The solution is 4 or -4.