The uniformity coefficient (Cu) of soil is a measure of the particle size distribution, defined as the ratio of the size of the 60th percentile of the grain size distribution to the size of the 10th percentile. For a well-graded soil, Cu is greater than 1, indicating a range of particle sizes, while a uniform soil with similar particle sizes will have a Cu value close to 1. Therefore, the statement that the uniformity coefficient of soil is always less than 1 is incorrect; it can be equal to 1 or greater than 1 depending on the soil's grading.
It is always less than 1 or 100%.It is always less than 1 or 100%.It is always less than 1 or 100%.It is always less than 1 or 100%.
0.34 is less than 1. In numerical terms, any positive number less than 1 will have a decimal value that is smaller than 1. Therefore, 0.34, being a decimal less than 1, is indeed less than 1.
1 inch is less than 28 inches or 1 yard.1 inch is less than 28 inches or 1 yard.1 inch is less than 28 inches or 1 yard.1 inch is less than 28 inches or 1 yard.
It can be improper AND negative (less than 0 and so less than 1).
34.32245Correlation coefficient is less than -1 and greater than 1.Note: The Correlation coefficient is lies between -1 to 1 if it is 0 mean there is no correlation between them.
Friction has a low coefficient, usually less than 1.
No. A correlation coefficient cannot be less than -1 (or greater than +1)
A serious error. The maximum magnitude for a correlation coefficient is 1.The Correlation coefficient is lies between -1 to 1 if it is 0 mean there is no correlation between them. Here they are given less than -1 value so it is not a value of correlation coefficient.
When using scientific notation, the coefficient must be between greater than or equal to 1, and less than 10. For example, 5.17, 9.63, and 1.49 are all correct coefficients, while 0.12 and 10.87 are not.
It isnt, for deflection angles b less than 90o, Cvane should be greater than 1.0, while for angles greater than 90o, it should be less than 1. Alot of times it is less then one because it is the ratio between the actual force and ideal force. Factual/Fideal. Since friction acts on the actual force, it is going to be less then the ideal force, resulting in a number lower than one.
The coefficient of friction is not always constant as it can vary depending on factors like materials in contact, surface roughness, and presence of lubricants.
No.
The phenol coefficient is a measure used to evaluate the disinfecting power of a chemical compared to phenol. It is determined by comparing the dilution of a test compound that achieves a specific level of microbial kill to that of phenol under identical conditions. A phenol coefficient greater than 1 indicates that the test compound is more effective than phenol, while a coefficient less than 1 indicates lower effectiveness. This metric helps in assessing the potency of disinfectants in microbiological applications.
Yes, a coefficient of friction can exceed 1. This can happen in cases where the force required to move an object is greater than the maximum force that can be provided by the contact surface. This would result in a coefficient of friction greater than 1.
Yes, it is possible for the coefficient of friction to exceed 1 in a given scenario. This can happen when the force required to move an object is greater than the force pressing the object against the surface, resulting in a coefficient of friction greater than 1.
The COF will always be less than 1 a little confusing as im getting more than 1 with calculations at the moment, but i know its always less than one, its what the lectures at the university have told me. I am assuming if it is more than one you take the inverse of that number but im not sure, im looking for more information. its kind of like a percentage for efficiency. you cant have 110% efficient.