One kilogram of gold and one kilogram of feathers both weigh the same, but they occupy different volumes. Gold is much denser than feathers, so 1 kilogram of gold will take up significantly less space than 1 kilogram of feathers. Therefore, the feathers will take up more space than the gold.
A kilogram of sand takes up less space than a kilogram of air, because sand is more dense than air. A kilogram of sand takes up more space than a kilogram of gold, because sand is less dense than gold.
Bricks have more density whereas feathers have less comparatively. Space occupied ie volume = mass/ density. So space occupied is inversely related to the density. Hence feathers occupy more space than the bricks.
Because sand is a more dense substance than feathers - it has a larger mass-to-volume ratio.
Oh, what a lovely question! You see, both 1 kilogram of copper and 1 kilogram of iron have the same weight because they both weigh 1 kilogram. However, copper is denser than iron, so a 1-kilogram block of copper will take up less space than a 1-kilogram block of iron. It's all about how tightly packed the atoms are in each material.
One kilogram of gold and one kilogram of feathers both weigh the same, but they occupy different volumes. Gold is much denser than feathers, so 1 kilogram of gold will take up significantly less space than 1 kilogram of feathers. Therefore, the feathers will take up more space than the gold.
A kilogram of sand takes up less space than a kilogram of air, because sand is more dense than air. A kilogram of sand takes up more space than a kilogram of gold, because sand is less dense than gold.
because sand is smaller than feathers and it would take up as much space with the sand , and if the feathers were there it would take up more space because its and larger object than the sand .
i dont know if this is correct butt, i think mass, because , mass is considered as matter half the time, and a feathers kilograms take up less space than sands. this is because of the width of the object or substance? no promises but i think this is rightt <333
One kilogram of lead is denser than one kilogram of feathers, so it takes up less space. This makes it easier to carry the lead compared to the same weight of feathers, which would occupy much more volume and be more cumbersome.
The weight of 1 kilogram of feathers has the same weight as one kilogram of gold, because they both weigh the same. Now, they do not have the same volume at all, think about it, to make a kilogram of feathers you need a whole lot of them right? yes is the answer. Now try to picture one kilogram of gold... if you can't, just google it. So a kilogram of gold woudn't have the same volume as the feathers, and the feathers would have the most volume.
Sand is denser than feathers. Since a given volume of a denser material has more mass than the same volume of a less dense material, when you make the masses the same, the volumes must vary.
In water, the weight of one kilogram of feathers would be slightly less than one kilogram due to the buoyant force acting on the feathers. This is because the feathers displace an amount of water equal to their weight, reducing the net force acting on them.
If you had a perfect scale, that could read to, say, the millionth decimal place, and you used it for each, then the lead would weigh more, because its center would be closer to the center of the earth.
Bricks have more density whereas feathers have less comparatively. Space occupied ie volume = mass/ density. So space occupied is inversely related to the density. Hence feathers occupy more space than the bricks.
A kilogram of mercury and a kilogram of water both weigh the same - 1 kilogram. However, mercury is more dense than water, so a kilogram of mercury takes up less space than a kilogram of water. This can give the impression that the kilogram of mercury is heavier, but in reality, they have the same weight.
Because of its' mass density. The lead would be much smaller in size.