The Pappus-Guldinus theorem consists of two parts concerning the volume and surface area of solids of revolution. The first part states that the volume ( V ) of a solid of revolution generated by rotating a plane figure ( A ) about an external axis is given by ( V = A \cdot d ), where ( d ) is the distance traveled by the centroid of ( A ). The second part states that the surface area ( S ) of the solid is given by ( S = P \cdot d ), where ( P ) is the perimeter of the figure and ( d ) is the same distance traveled by the centroid.
Proof Outline: For the volume, consider a plane figure ( A ) with centroid distance ( d ) from the axis of rotation. When ( A ) is rotated, it sweeps out a cylindrical volume, leading to ( V = A \cdot d ) by integrating the circular cross-sections. For the surface area, when the figure is rotated, each infinitesimal segment contributes a cylindrical surface area, leading to ( S = P \cdot d ) through a similar integration process. Both results can be derived using calculus and the properties of centroids and integration.
Yes, the corollary to one theorem can be used to prove another theorem.
You cannot solve a theorem: you can prove the theorem or you can solve a question based on the remainder theorem.
asa theorem
A theorem to prove. A series of logical statements. A series of reasons for the statements. answer theorem to prove
A segment need not be a bisector. No theorem can be used to prove something that may not be true!
Yes, the corollary to one theorem can be used to prove another theorem.
Theorem 8.11 in what book?
You cannot solve a theorem: you can prove the theorem or you can solve a question based on the remainder theorem.
asa theorem
A theorem to prove. A series of logical statements. A series of reasons for the statements. answer theorem to prove
A segment need not be a bisector. No theorem can be used to prove something that may not be true!
I will give a link that explains and proves the theorem.
HL congruence theorem
Q.e.d.
I have to prove http://s5.tinypic.com/19ldma.jpg http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/9263/mathhlproofou4.jpg without using pythagorean theorem
defenition and postualte
..?