It can be. 21 is relatively prime with 32.
No, 100 and 202 are not relatively prime. Relatively prime numbers only have the number 1 as a common factor. The number 1 is a common factor for them, but the number 2 is another common factor that they have, so they are not relatively prime.
37 is already prime. 3 x 31 = 93 No common prime factors, the GCF is 1.
209 is relatively prime (as is 211).
27 is not a prime number and i dont know about 117 but i dont think its a composite # * * * * * The person who gave the above answer has no understanding of "relative primes". Or primes, for that matter. Neither 8 nor 9 is a prime BUT 8 and 9 are relatively prime (or co-prime) because they have no factor in common. That is what relatively prime means. 117 is not a prime, even if the previous answerer thinks otherwise. 27 and 117 are not relatively prime because both are divisible by 3.
No, they are not relatively prime.
No, they are not relatively prime.
No, 63 and 74 are not relatively prime because they have a common factor of 1.
Yes, 143 and 63 are relatively prime because they have no prime factors in common.
ya they are relatively prime
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
No.
No, they are not.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
30 and 63 are relatively prime numbers. The factors of 30 are 1, 2, 3, 5, and 30, and the factors of 63 are 1, 7, 9, and 63. Two or more numbers are relatively prime if 1 is their only common factor.