Yes: 22 + 02 = 4.
It's not possible. For two numbers to have a sum of 13, one would have to be even, that is, divisible by 2.
-6 and -9
Yes, that is true.
There are no real numbers with the sum of 4 and a product of -477. The factors of -477 are (1,-477), (3, -159) and (9, -53). The negatives can be switched to the other numbers in those pairs of factors.
Another square number.
There are no two whole numbers which when squared sum to 62. There are infinitely may pairs of irrational numbers that when squared sum to 62, eg 1 and √61, 2 and √58
2 squared = 4 8 squared = 64 2 squared + 8 squared = 4 + 64 = 68 8 squared - 2 squared = 6 squared = 36 The product of 8 x 2 = 16.
All prime numbers greater than 2 are odd numbers. For an odd prime to be written as the sum of two primes, one of the primes must be 2 because two odd primes will produce an even sum. 11 cannot be written as the sum of two primes. 13 = 2 + 11. 17 cannot be written as the sum of two primes. 19 = 2 + 17.
5
It is not clear what the question means: there are 31 2-digit numbers that can be expressed as a sum of two squares.
Yes, Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction.
4
Those numbers would be 13 and 8. 13 squared + 8 squared This is equal to: 169 + 64 which equals 233 And finally, 13 - 8 equals 5.
No.
The sum of two numbers is the result given when the two numbers are added together. For example, the sum of 2 and 3 is 5.
The sum of the numbers is 26. The numbers are 12 and 14.
Oh, dude, you're hitting me with some math here. So, let's break it down - we need two numbers that, when squared, add up to 10. Well, 1 squared is 1, and 3 squared is 9, so 1 and 3 are the numbers you're looking for. But hey, who's really keeping track of all these numbers anyway, right?