Neither is divisible by 8.
8 is, because it's the only perfect cube. 39 is, because it's the only one divisible by 13. 51 is, because it's the only one divisible by 17. 123 is, because it's the only one divisible by 41. 124 is, because it's the only one divisible by 31 892 is, because it's the only one divisible by 223.
Every number is divisible by any non-zero number. 527 is not evenly divisible by 3.
Every number is divisible by any non-zero number. However, 1023 is not evenly divisible by 2.
It's very easy to test a number to see if it is divisible by 4 or by 9. If it passes both tests, then it is divisible by 4x9=36.To test for divisibility by 9, add the digits of the number. If the sum is divisible by 9, then the number is divisible by 9.To test for divisibility by 4, look at the last two digits. If they are a multiple of 4, then the number is divisible by 4.
No. For a number to be divisible by 100 it needs to be a whole number and end in 00.
Because the four is not 5 or 0 then this number is not divisible by 5.
The rule of thumb is that if the sum of the digits of the number equals a number that is divisible by 3, then the number is divisible by 3.For example,372: 3+7+2 = 12, which is a multiple of 3 (3x4=12)So, 3 is a factor of 372(which is true, as 3 x 124 = 372).124: 1+2+4 = 7, which is not a multiple of 3So, 3 is not a factor of 124(which is true, as 124 is not evenly divisible by 3, 124/3 = 41.33333)
yes because its a even number
124 is divisible by 4
124 / 9 = 13.777777778
Any number that ends with 0, 2, 4, 6, or 8 is divisible by 2.
No.
No
Neither is divisible by 8.
no 120 = 8 x 15 128 = 8 x 16
Oh, dude, let me break it down for you. So, 124 isn't divisible by 3 because if you add up the digits (1 + 2 + 4 = 7), that sum isn't divisible by 3. And 124 isn't divisible by 6 either because it's not an even number. As for 9, nope, it doesn't work because the sum of the digits (1 + 2 + 4 = 7) isn't divisible by 9. So, in conclusion, 124 is just being a rebel and not playing nice with these numbers.