Yes. By definition numbers are relatively prime (AKA co-prime) if they share no common prime factors. It follows that if two numbers are co-prime then their greatest common demoninator is 1. Mathematicians often use GCD(m,n) = 1 as an unambiguous way of expressing the co-primeness of m and n. In fact they often abbreviate that to (m,n) = 1.
12 = 2*2*3 and 25 = 5*5, have no common prime factors, so they are co-prime. By the fundamental therorem of arithmetic, if they have no common prime factors, then they have no common factors at all.
It is irrelevant that multiples of those numbers can be the same. In fact for any two numbers, m and n, we can multiply each by the other to get the same number i.e. m*n = n*m. In fact, the lowest common multiple of two co-prime numbers is their product, and that really is the property that makes co-primeness special - you need to be familiar with modulo arithmetic to appreciate that fully.
NB By convention 1 is not a prime, and so it can't be a common prime factor. That might seem strange, but it is very convenient. If it weren't so, at least tens of thousands of theorems would have to be rewritten to say e.g. "for all prime except 1..."
no
12 and 35 are NOT prime numbers.
Two numbers which are "relatively prime" have no common prime factors. To illustrate, let's write several numbers in terms of their prime factors: 24 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 25 = 5 x 5 42 = 2 x 3 x 7 70 = 2 x 5 x 7 You can see that 24 and 25 are relatively prime, because they don't share any common prime factors. Likewise, 25 and 42 are relatively prime. 24 and 42, however, are NOT relatively prime because they share the common factors of 2 and 3. Likewise 25 and 70 are NOT relatively prime because they share the common factor 5. When a fraction is in its simplest form, the numerator and denominator are relatively prime.
No, 12 and 15 aren't relatively prime, because they both share as a prime factor 3. Dividing both12 and 15 by 3 gives 4 and 5 respectively. Consecutive numbers are always coprime. Coprime numbers are relatively prime to each other, as they share no prime factors, for example 33 and 35,
22 is not relatively prime
25 is relatively prime with 36. 25 is not relatively prime with 35.
Two numbers are relatively prime if the only factor they have in common is 1. The factors of 12 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12. The factors of 25 are 1, 5, and 10. The only factor they have in common is 1, so they are relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
No, they are not relatively prime.
It can be. 16 is relatively prime with 25.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
no
Relatively prime, yes.
25 and 98 are not prime numbers
26
No.