0
What else can I help you with?
The sum of 3 consecutive odd numbers is 59 what are the numbers?
The sum of three consecutive odd numbers must be divisible by 3. As 59 is not wholly divisible by 3 the question is invalid. PROOF : Let the numbers be n - 2, n and n + 2. Then the sum is 3n which is divisible by 3. If the question refers to three consecutive numbers then a similar proof shows that the sum of these three numbers is also divisible by 3. Again, the question would be invalid.
The sum of 3 consective numbers is divisible by 3?
Any three consecutive integers are divisible by three because it can be shown that the sum divided by three is the middle number.
Can the sum of any three consecutive whole numbers be divisible by 6?
Yes, if the first number is odd.
Why is the product of any consecutive integers divisible by 6?
There must be three consecutive integers to guarantee that the product will be divisible by 6. For the "Product of three consecutive integers..." see the Related Question below.
What three consecutive numbers can be multiplied to get 387?
This is no set of three consecutive numbers that when multiplied equal 387.
What three consecutive natural numbers are not divisible by three?
0, 1, 2
Is it true that the product of any three consecutive number is divisible by 6?
Yes, the product of any three consecutive numbers is divisible by 6. This is because among any three consecutive integers, at least one of them is even (ensuring divisibility by 2), and at least one of them is divisible by 3. Since 6 is the product of 2 and 3, the product of any three consecutive numbers is therefore divisible by 6.
What are 3 consecutive numbers whose sum is 125?
That doesn't work. The number has to be divisible by three. Any three consecutive numbers add up to a multiple of three.
Is the sum of three consecutive whole numbers divisible by three?
5+2+1=8 and 8 is not divisible by 3.
The sum of 3 consecutive odd numbers is 59 what are the numbers?
The sum of three consecutive odd numbers must be divisible by 3. As 59 is not wholly divisible by 3 the question is invalid. PROOF : Let the numbers be n - 2, n and n + 2. Then the sum is 3n which is divisible by 3. If the question refers to three consecutive numbers then a similar proof shows that the sum of these three numbers is also divisible by 3. Again, the question would be invalid.
Can there be three primes that are consecutive natural numbers?
No.
Can three consecutive numbers be divided by 3 Explain?
Yes, three consecutive numbers can be divided by 3, but only one of them will be divisible by 3. In any set of three consecutive integers, one of the numbers will be a multiple of 3, while the other two will not be. For example, in the set (4, 5, 6), the number 6 is divisible by 3.
The sum of 3 consective numbers is divisible by 3?
Any three consecutive integers are divisible by three because it can be shown that the sum divided by three is the middle number.
Are any consecutive natural numbers also prime numbers?
2, 3Those two are consecutive, natural and prime numbers! It's as easy as one, two, three! (Pun intended)
Can the sum of any three consecutive whole numbers be divisible by 6?
Yes, if the first number is odd.
What is the sum of three consecutive natural numbers is 411?
It is a statement of numerical fact.
What are the 3 consecutive even number with sum of 32?
The sum of any three consecutive even numbers must be divisible by 3. 32 is not, so there is no solution.
