The human brain can’t maintain relationships with more than 150 people - apex
Relationships humans can healthily maintain;; Apex
Dunbar's number states the number of people one knows and keeps social contact with, and it does not include the number of people known personal.
It would help if the question stated after which landmark number.
A number raised to the second power is a number times itself. This can also be stated as a number squared.
2.26 million is stated as 2,260,000.
This is known as a mixed number. For example, the improper fraction 22/7 can be stated as the mixed number 31/7.
A mixed number fraction is when you have both a whole number and a fraction stated together. For example, "three and a half" or "five and one quarter".
george
That is called the square root of a number.
Square root
It would help if the question stated after which landmark number.
A number raised to the second power is a number times itself. This can also be stated as a number squared.
0 times any number, in any base, is 0.
Robin Dunbar proposed, based on primate research, a relation between brain size and the number of social relationships an individual can maintain. Dunbar proposed, furthermore, that the evolution of language greatly reduced the mental effort required to maintain the same number of social relationships. How this all relates to the evolution of the brain is not immediately evident to me, although it undoubtedly does.
The question, as stated, does not make sense. Numbers are not continuous - they are discrete.
101 is not a number sequence. So the question, as stated, makes no sense.
It is never stated in Harry Potter.
2.26 million is stated as 2,260,000.
An age distribution is the number of people in stated age ranges.