This (If a>b and b>c then a>c) is an example of the transitive law or law of transitivity. A good treatment is in Chapter 1 of the classic textbook A Survey of Modern Algebra by G Birkhoff & S MacLane. My answer is a brief version of theirs. First we establish that we are are working in the type of algebraic structure called an ordered domain. Well-known examples are the integers and the real numbers. We assume we have elements a, b etc. and an operation +, such that a+b is an element of the domain. Fundamental properties (assumed as postulates) include that there is an element called zero (0) such that a+0=0, and that every element a has an inverse x such that a+x=0. The inverse of a is conventionally called -a. Also b+(-a) is conventionally written b-a.
So far this is just a domain. We now define what we mean by an ordered domain. This is a domain in which some of the elements are said to be positive, with the following properties : (the addition principle) if a and b are positive, then a+b is positive; and (the law of trichotomy), for a given a, either a is positive, or a=0, or -a is positive. A relation > is now defined as follows : a>b if and only if a-b is positive.
Having established the definitions and postulates we can now prove the result. If a>b and b>c, then by definition this means that a-b and b-c are positive. Now a-c=a+(-c) and (-b)+b=0, so a-c=a+0+(-c)=a+(-b)+b+(-c)=(a-b)+(b-c), which is the sum of two positive numbers and so is positive by the addition principle. We have proved a-c is positive, i.e. a>c as required.
Note I have also used the associative law a+(b+c)=(a+b)+c which I forgot to mention!
I hope the above isn't too heavy - but if a person asks the original question and doesn't just think "it's obvious" as many people would, I expect that person is probably interested in the fundamentals of mathematics!
a < b < c So, neither a nor b is greater than c.
a/b = c/d Multiply both sides by b/c Thus (a/b)*(b/c) = (c/d)*(b/c) ie a/c = b/d
if a is bigger than b and b is bigger than c a must be bigger than c... Transitivity
complement of c
16
a < b < c So, neither a nor b is greater than c.
Yes because A > B, B > C, so A has to be > C.ExampleA=5B=3C=1A (5) > B (3)B (3) > C (1)A (5) > C (1)
False. A is greater than C. ******************** I'm not in calculus but if A isn't less than B, then that means its either greater than or equal to it. and if B isn't less than C then its greater or equal to. so that means that A is either greater than or equal to C. so that means that A than C.
NO it is not because if a<b<c it could also be said without the b as a<c.
I believe that's usually treated as an axiom, meaning you don't prove it.
Absolutely not
It is not possible to answer the question without any information on what a, b and c are.
A is greater than B (A>B). C is less than D (C<D). But what about "less than or equal"?
You don't. Such an efficiency can be less than 1, but it can't be greater than 1.
Transitive Property (mathematics), property of a mathematical relation such that if the relation holds between a and b and between b and c, then it also exists between a and c. The equality relation, for example, is transitive because if a = b and b = c, then a = c. Other transitive relations include greater than (>), less than (<), greater than or equal to (?), and less than or equal to (?).
a/b = c/d Multiply both sides by b/c Thus (a/b)*(b/c) = (c/d)*(b/c) ie a/c = b/d
Dim a, b, c As Integer a = InputBox("enter 1st no.") b = InputBox("enter 2nd no.") c = InputBox("enter 3rd no.") If a > b Then If a > c Then MsgBox("A is Greater") Else MsgBox("C is greater") End If Else If b > c Then MsgBox("B is Greater") Else MsgBox("C is Greater") End If End If End Sub