The length of the third side must be greater than the difference between the length of the two given sides and it must be less than the sum of the two given sides.
These limits can be derived from the fact that any two sides of a triangle must have a combined length greater than the third side.
It is 2.5 times the length of FG. Since the latter length is not given, it is not possible to provide a more comprehensive answer.
If you are only given the side lengths of a scalene triangle, it is impossible for you to find for the area, unless you are given more information... like the height of the triangle for example. If this is a right triangle you would like to find the area of, you can multiply the length of each leg with each other, and then divide that product by 2 to conclude the area of the triangle.
Given side lengths of 8 units, an equilateral triangle will have an altitude of 7 (6.9282) units.
A triangle with two equal sides is an isosceles triangle and you can have as many as you like.
Yes because the given dimensions comply with Pythagoras's theorem for a right angle triangle.
Yes, it is possible.
If you mean side lengths of 5, 4 and 1 then it is not possible to construct any triangle from the given dimensions.
From geometry, we know that it is possible to calculate unknown lengths and angles of a triangle given particular information regarding the other angles and lengths of the sides of a triangle. For example, given beginning coordinates such as (x,y) in plane coordinates or the latitude and longitude, it is then possible to calculate new coordinates by measuring certain angles and distances (lengths of sides of a triangle).
That depends on what the side lengths are. Until the side lengths are known, the triangle can only be classified as a triangle.
It is not possible to answer the question without information about the shape. The fact that there are three numbers given might suggest that it is a triangle. However the three lengths are not consistent with a triangle.
Yes, it's entirely possible, and quite easy as well.
Yes and the given lengths would form an isosceles triangle.
It is not possible to determine the measure of an angle if the lengths of two sides are given.
you can fine the perimeter
There are not any following lengths in the question to compare. Using the sizes given, and Pythagorean Theorem, the Hypotenuse of the triangle is 36.76 - which will have to do!
No because the given lengths don't comply with Pythagoras' theorem for a right angle triangle.
It is 2.5 times the length of FG. Since the latter length is not given, it is not possible to provide a more comprehensive answer.