it takes 3 cats to eat 3 mice in 3 minutes. Meaning 3 cats can eat 99 mice in 99 mins. Those 3 cats will take 102 mins to eat one cat. YOu need one extra cat to eat the last mice. So the answer is 4 cats.
If 5 cats catch 5 rats in 5 minutes, that means each cat catches one rat in 5 minutes. So, to catch 100 rats in 100 minutes, you'd need 100 cats. But let's be real, if you have 100 cats running around trying to catch rats, you probably have bigger problems to deal with.
There are 60 minutes in one hour. Therefore, to find the number of minutes in three and a half hours, you would multiply 60 by 3 to get 180 minutes for three hours, and then add half of 60 (30 minutes) to get a total of 210 minutes in three and a half hours.
Oh, isn't that just a happy little question! 3.25 hours is the same as 195 minutes. Just imagine all the beautiful things you can create in that amount of time, my friend. Just remember, there are no mistakes, only happy little accidents.
He would have to fish 4 hours long because if kim would catch 16 fish in 2 hours. 4 time 4 is 16 as well so therefore he would have to fish for hours
.25 would be 15 minutes.
5 minutes
If it takes 5 cats 5 minutes to catch 5 mice, then it would also take 100 cats 5 minutes to catch 100 mice. Each cat catches one mouse in one minute, so the time it takes depends on the number of cats, not the number of mice.
If five storks catch five frogs in five minutes, then each stork catches one frog in that time. Therefore, 100 storks would also catch 100 frogs in the same five minutes, since they can all work simultaneously. Thus, it would take 100 storks five minutes to catch 100 frogs.
Since 1 swatbu can catch one spy every 5 minutes, each one could catch 20 spies in 100 minutes. The answer is 5.
If 29 frogs can catch 29 flies in 29 minutes, it means each frog catches one fly in 29 minutes. Therefore, to catch 87 flies in 87 minutes, you would still need 29 frogs.
I would Recommend Ultra balls.
5 minutes; 5 minutes (unless the fish stock gets depleted and the storks have to find another lake!)
If 5 cats catch 5 rats in 5 minutes, that means each cat catches one rat in 5 minutes. So, to catch 100 rats in 100 minutes, you'd need 100 cats. But let's be real, if you have 100 cats running around trying to catch rats, you probably have bigger problems to deal with.
It'll take 4 because if 4 cats catch 4 mice in 4 minutes, it means it takes 1 minute for one cat to catch 1 mouse. So if 10 cats were the answer, the question would be, how many cats will it take to catch 10 mice in four minutes. This question is obvious...
A fourth of an hour is 60/4=15 minutes, so three quarters of an hour would be 15x3= 45 minutes.
it's basically impossible because you know that it takes 1 cat to catch 1 mouse, so that means it takes 100 cats to catch 100 mice. But the question you have doesn't tell me how many minutes it takes for 1 cat to catch 1 mouse. e.g say it took 5 minutes for 1 cat to catch 1 mouse you times 5 by 100 and you get 500 so it would take 500 minutes for 100 cats to catch 100 mice. but your question doesn't have the time for how long it would take for 1 cat to catch 1 mouse. so therefore your question can't be answered.
It would still take 3 minutes according to the setup of the question, assuming there are enough rats to make this work. It takes 1 cat 3 minutes to find a rat, and 3 minutes for 3 cats to each find a rat. So 100 cats would only take 3 minutes to find 100 rats. Time is irrelevant since the only factors changing are the cats and the rats. However, this question assumes too many things that would likely not happen. The question assumes an even density of rats, that the cat's are equally able to catch rats, and that there are enough rats.