Yes - it is three times as small
The smaller the value the closer it is to zero..003 < .01, therefore .003 is closer to zero.On a number line (not to scale):---(0)--(.001)-(.002)-(.003)-(.004)-(.005)-(.006)-(.007)-(.008)-(.009)-(.010)-(.011)Notice how .003 is closer to 0 than .010
No.
nothing since they both are one.
.0032 is greater than .003
.003 is faster than .005
The smaller the value the closer it is to zero..003 < .01, therefore .003 is closer to zero.On a number line (not to scale):---(0)--(.001)-(.002)-(.003)-(.004)-(.005)-(.006)-(.007)-(.008)-(.009)-(.010)-(.011)Notice how .003 is closer to 0 than .010
To determine if 003 is smaller than 005, you can compare the numbers by their value. Both are three-digit numbers, but when considering their actual values, 003 is equivalent to 3, and 005 is equivalent to 5. Since 3 is less than 5, it follows that 003 is indeed smaller than 005.
No.
.06 is smaller than .063 by .003.
On the main bearings, .001, to .003.
nothing since they both are one.
.0032 is greater than .003
.003 is faster than .005
Without a decimal point, they are both the same. If you asked "Which is less .01 or .001", then .001 is the smaller number.
3 tenths is equal to 0.3.001 is equal to 1.1 is greater than 0.3, so 3 tenths is smaller.
005 is thicker than 003
3 Thousandths = .003 3.995 - .003 = 3.992